Get help

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Research

Evaluating your Research

Who's voice?

In 2020 the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies published the Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. The Code’s framework is guided by four principles: Indigenous self-determination, Indigenous leadership, impact and value, and sustainability and accountability. It is essential that you know this as part of your research practice.

Griffith is committed to the ethical conduct of research and has many resources available including support provided by the Griffith's Ethics and integrity team.

Evaluate your resources

Check for bias

Ensure the resources you choose have diverse, and authentic voices and representation. Check for:

  • Omission: selective reporting of information, often from the writer's or dominant cultural viewpoint and omitting the contribution/point of view of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
  • Defamation: negative reporting of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' contributions, situations, and culture
  • Disparagement: denying or belittling the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to Australian culture
  • Cumulative Implication: only crediting one group for positive developments in society
  • Validity: failing to ensure that information is accurate, unambiguous and represents Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' perspectives
  • Inertia: perpetuation of myths and half-truths by failure to keep abreast of historical scholarship
  • Obliteration: ignoring significant aspects of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures
  • Disembodiment: referring in a casual, generalised, and depersonalised way to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and cultures
  • Concreteness: generalising and stereotyping Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, cultures, and experiences
  • Comprehensiveness: omitting relevant facts that would provide a diverse, well-rounded understanding of a topic

(University of South Australia. 2013)

Diversity and complexity vs stereotypes and generalisation

Many resources written before the 1980s portrayed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and cultures through stereotypes, generalisations, and inaccurate outsider perspectives.

These days many resources are written by, or in consultation with, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and refer to specific Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups, thus illustrating the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures.

Check to see if there are any Indigenous academics writing within your disciple.

Use the check lists below to help you decide whether a resource is suitable to represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives.

Characteristics of resources that DO represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

  • Up to date
  • Accurate
  • Illustrations and photographs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are relevant to the text and are accurate portrayals
  • Photographs are accompanied by captions which name the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person, or group, and indicate where they come from
  • Acknowledges Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander participation in the research, writing and presentation processes
  • Are about the local area or state
  • Endorsed by local, regional, state or territory Aboriginal education consultative groups
  • Endorsed by other Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander groups
  • Acceptable to the local Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander community
  • Authored and or led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander scholars

Characteristics of resources that do NOT represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives

  • Perpetuates the concept of terra nullius
  • Ignores or misrepresents Aboriginal resistance to European occupation of the land
  • Overgeneralises
  • Ignores the number and diversity of Torres Strait Islander and Aboriginal knowledges, languages, cultures and customs
  • Overrepresents men
  • Trivialises women's roles in Aboriginal societies
  • Presents stereotypes and racist connotations
  • Assumes that all Torres Strait Islander people and Aboriginal people live in the past
  • Emphasises the "exotic" to the exclusion of other cultural aspects
  • Excludes Torres Strait Islander people
  • Creates a "them" and "us" separation between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous peoples
  • Excludes some readers by assuming a European background

 

Acknowledging content from the University of Queensland Library guide Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives and the University of South Australia. (2013).Evaluating texts. Respect, Relationships Reconciliation (the 3Rs) – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education: Resources for pre-service teachers, University of South Australia, Evaluating texts - 3Rs (rrr.edu.au)  

Further in depth guidance is available from the AIATSIS Guide to evaluating and selecting education resources.